tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3604515438787408842.post8880716506479454345..comments2023-07-18T16:13:00.669+01:00Comments on IronPython URLs: Pumping Iron: Dynamic Languages on .NEThexdump42http://www.blogger.com/profile/13884562284992556003noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3604515438787408842.post-65911953365472750982008-12-29T13:45:00.000+00:002008-12-29T13:45:00.000+00:00I'm sure you're right. However all I'm doing is qu...I'm sure you're right. However all I'm doing is quoting the original article by Jonathan - who in turn 'borrowed' most of the material from Harry Pierson.<BR/><BR/>Both of them are dynamic typing enthusiasts who previously almost exclusively used statically typed programming languages. Hopefully those who click through will find a bit more of a balanced approach. :-)Michael Foordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06229713779852499022noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3604515438787408842.post-6670474553962630482008-12-29T05:59:00.000+00:002008-12-29T05:59:00.000+00:00Hi Fuzzyman,Unfortunately you come across as too m...Hi Fuzzyman,<BR/>Unfortunately you come across as too much of a dynamic language advocate in this otherwise well-written article to shift any of the static advocates methinks.<BR/><BR/>I was thinking that what might persuade is much more testimony from noted static language programmers that things don't fall apart when using a dynamic language and tests. <BR/><BR/>- Paddy.<BR/><BR/>P.S. Have a happy new year.Paddy3118https://www.blogger.com/profile/06899509753521482267noreply@blogger.com