IronPython and Python 2.6

By Michael Foord -
Now that Python 2.6 is out of the door the IronPython team are working on IronPython support for 2.6 features. Useful new features in Python 2.6 (or at least the ones I particularly like) include:
  • with statement available without future import
  • New syntax for exception handling
  • Class decorators
  • hasattr not discarding all exceptions
  • Being able to provide keyword arguments after *args
  • Getter, setter and deleter on properties (damn useful)
  • __dir__ support
In fact the last one is already available - it is analogous to the method GetMemberNames that you can implement on .NET objects to provide dynamic Python behavior for classes implemented in C#. Because it was basically already there, the IronPython team built it into IronPython 2 anyway.

Now that IronPython 2 is also out of the door, the team have been working on the 2.1 branch and implementing Python 2.6 features. Of course having IronPython 2.1 tracking Python 2.6 is a recipe for confusion, so Dave Fugate asked whether the new branch should be renamed IronPython 2.6:
I think the name for the next major release of IronPython might still be up in the air so to speak, but our developers have indeed started working on CPython 2.6 features. If you build the latest source drop from CodePlex, you should now be able to pass the '-X:Python26' flag to ipy.exe.

Speaking of the next major release, do people prefer "IronPython 2.6" implying that we're targeting CPython 2.6 features or "IronPython 2.1" following the pattern we established with IP 1.1? My gut feeling is that IP 2.6 would cause less confusion...
Personally I agree that "IronPython 2.6" would be less confusing, and it is also the pattern followed by Jython for its version numbers.

Yesterday Dave Fugate posted this email to the IronPython mailing list:
Some of you may have noticed that IronPython bugs on CodePlex previously assigned to the “2.1” release are now assigned to “2.6”. We’ve simply renamed the 2.1 release of IronPython to 2.6 to reflect upon the fact that the next major release of IronPython will be largely compatible with CPython 2.6. All details about IP 2.1 that were previously discussed on Harry Pierson’s blog still apply to IP 2.6. We’re doing this simple name change to help eliminate confusion about IronPython’s compatibility with various CPython and Jython releases.
Great news.

Dave also has another recent blog entry responding to another blog claiming that Sun hiring Jython developers and Microsoft developing IronPython is an attack on Python and free software:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Extending Abobe Flash Player and AIR with Python and Ruby

By Michael Foord -
An intriguing blog entry about an Adobe experimental project. It is a C/C++ cross- compiler for the flash player and AIR. This means that you can (will be able to?) cross-compile the Python / Ruby/ lots of other language runtimes and then run them in Flash. The blog entry contrasts this approach to the DLR which requires the re-implementation of dynamic languages - hence IronPython and IronRuby. The project is already beyond proof-of concept, they even have Quake III cross-compiled and running in Flash. Extending Adobe Flash Player and AIR with C/C++ Cross-Compiler Quake 3 has already been ported to managed code , but this is even more impressive. Whether the Python interpreter can be cross-compiled to run on top of another runtime (with completely different basic types), without changing the language semantics at all, has yet to be proved - but it is a very interesting project. (It also means that Python/Ruby will possibly be enabled only by additional optional downloads - but don...
Read more

IronPython Tools for Visual Studio CTP3

By Michael Foord -
At PyCon this year Dino Veihland announced IronPython Tools for Visual Studio, an extension to Visual Studio 2010 for working with IronPython. It features Python syntax highlighting, awesome auto-complete (intellisense) and a host of other features for working with IronPython code in Visual Studio. It can be used with the free Visual Studio shell and doesn't require you to own a full copy of Visual Studio. The third CTP (Community Technology Preview) has been made available for download. IronPython Tools for Visual Studio We are happy to announce a minor update to the IronPython Tools for Visual Studio.  IronPython Tools for Visual Studio (IPyTools) is a set of extensions available for Visual Studio 2010 which supports development of IronPython applications.  This release is our 3rd Community Technical Preview (CTP) and builds upon the previous two releases.  The release is a minor update which includes bug fixes and a number of small features.  You can download...
Read more

Further Adventures of the Debugger

By Michael Foord -
Harry Pierson (Microsoft IronPython PM) has been experimenting with writing an IronPython debugger ( ipydbg ) on top of the .NET MDbg APIs. When we last left him , he had implemented Just My Code (JMC) support allowing you to step into IronPython code. Since then he has made a lot of progress including a colourful REPL (interactive console) and solving some difficult problems around getting to real values behind boxed IronPython variables (needed for showing local variables). He has blogged extensively on what he has been up to (more recent posts last): Showing Source Code Colorful Console IronPython ConsoleColorMgr (the colorful console code pulled out into a separate IronPython module) A Little Hack...err...Cleanup Getting Local Variables Displaying Values Command Routing Getting Arguments REPL Console A lot of functionality is now present. In the command routing entry Harry outlines the seven commands supported by the debugger so far: Continue, Quit, Show Stack Trace, Show Locals, ...
Read more